I
buy therefore I am. Or even I consume therefore I am. As the car bumper sticker
puts it, ‘He who has the most toys wins.’
At
a time when shopping seems to have become our national sport and obsession –
the investment in new shopping centres is even greater than the investment in
new football stadiums, and possibly
greater even than our transitory investment in the Olympic movement –
and at a time when our country has got itself in to difficulty because the size
of our income has been no constraint on the amount we have sought to buy,
consumerism seems to have become a universal
way of thinking. Consumerism can scoop up even the most recalcitrant and
influence us insidiously. A generation which spends money we don’t have, to buy
things we don’t want , to impress people we don’t like cannot pretend that
education has somehow escaped the consumerist plague.
The
consumerism epidemic has three principal symptoms, even for those who resist it
fiercely:
First,
consumerism makes the most important question: do I like it? Not, is it beneficial? Enjoyment has become the most
important, or certainly the dominant, consideration in our lives. The appraisal
of lessons has become much more influenced by the question floating in the
senior manager’s head (or in the inspectors) ‘Are the pupils enjoying themselves’. If education is
training of the mind, why do we expect the hard yards of learning calculus to
me made fun, in a way that an Olympic athlete’s first training session of the
day, at 6 am, outside, in November,
never could be.
And
so our world is high on entertainment, low on challenge, high on instant
results, low on deferred gratification. Try reading that sentence again and
inserting ‘our schools’ for ‘our world’, or even ‘DfE initiatives’. Even churches
seek to entertain the congregations before trying to teach them. And we are all
doing this because of consumerism, and we don’t even realize, day to day, that
is happening.
Secondly,
consumerism teaches us that if it isn’t right just throw it away and get a new
one. A few years ago someone said to me that they didn’t want to buy a
television which lasted for more than 3 years, because they found the whole
experience of going out and buying a new television so exciting. The trouble
with this is that it means that pupils think that if they are finding learning
hard, they should just get a new teacher, managers think that if their workers
aren’t delivering, they should just fire them and hire new ones, rather than
training or helping them, and husbands and wives often think that if their
marriage isn’t working, they should just get rid of their husband or wife and
get a new one. Treating all things as disposable cons us into thinking that
people are too. And they aren’t. A message of education should be that we can
change people, otherwise, why bother teaching them. Isn’t teaching people
changing them?
Thirdly,
for a person in a consumerist society, their identity comes from their brands. People are defined by what they
buy. They are a Jack Wills person, or Quiksilver, or Burberry. They are Apple,
or Samsung, Mercedes or BMW, Bose or Beats. People long to get closer to the
being the very epitome of their favourite brand.
There
is no belonging because the brands
turn over so fast that no one can ever rest, and of course it ensures that
clothes can be thrown away long before they are worn out – which is the purpose
of fashion. Belonging to a brand is no help in a crisis. Not like belonging to
a village football club, or a Rotarian club, or a sailing club, or a book
group.
During
last summer my stepfather died, and my mother found that people from all the
clubs and associations in their small seaside town were kind and helpful to her.
Some from the allotment association, some from the Rotarians, and some from the
sailing club. When that kind of thing happens to our generation, no one will
call round from H&M, or Apple, or Mercedes Benz. Where will our belonging
be? If we are defined only by our brands, where will our roots be in a crisis?
Even
schools have become brands – as they try to create a sense of belonging in the
young which can keep up by multinationals being advised by the best branding
agencies in the world. Unsurprisingly, the advertising agencies, and the
multinationals they advise, are winning. And a generation of young people are
lovin’ it. It’s a race schools can’t win.
No comments:
Post a Comment